I’ve spent enough time on packaging lines to know that tips for reducing shipping damage are rarely about one magic material; they’re about matching the box, the insert, the seal, and the route to the actual abuse a shipment will see between the pallet wrapper and the customer’s porch. I remember standing next to a corrugated line in Columbus, Ohio while a team complained about a product that “looked fine” in a 32 ECT single-wall carton, only to discover the real trouble was stack pressure in trailer loads, not a bad product at all. That kind of failure is exactly why tips for reducing shipping damage need to start with the shipping environment, not the artwork on the box, and why a carton spec like 44 ECT or a double-wall A-flute build can matter more than a glossy finish.
At Custom Logo Things, I think the biggest misconception is that damage happens because a package is “handled roughly.” Sure, that happens. But far more often, the package was under-designed from the beginning, and the damage was baked in before the first label was printed. Good tips for reducing shipping damage are practical, measurable, and tied to the way your products move through ecommerce shipping, parcel networks, palletized freight, and order fulfillment lines. If you get the system right, you don’t need to overpack every order or accept a pile of claims as the cost of doing business, especially when a packaging change as small as switching to a 350gsm C1S artboard insert or a tighter die-cut can change the outcome.
Why shipping damage happens more often than people think
Most people imagine shipping damage as a dramatic event: a box dropped from waist height, a forklift tine punching through a carton, or a rain-soaked pallet sitting outside the dock door. Those happen, but they’re not the most common failures I’ve seen. More often, damage starts with a box that was technically “close enough” on paper but under-spec for the product weight, the stack pressure in the trailer, or the vibration that comes from 600 miles of highway travel. That is exactly why tips for reducing shipping damage begin with realistic testing and not guesswork, preferably with a drop schedule that includes 18-inch and 24-inch impacts plus compression checks at the unit weight you actually ship.
In simple terms, shipping damage is product harm caused by compression, impact, vibration, puncture, moisture, shifting, or poor palletization during storage and transit. I’ve seen scuffed cosmetic finishes on gift boxes because the insert allowed 3 to 5 millimeters of movement, and I’ve also seen expensive industrial parts fail because the carton bottom collapsed under stack load in a hot warehouse. The damage looked different each time, but the cause was still a mismatch between the package and the shipment, often a mismatch that could have been avoided with a tighter packout or a 200# test board instead of a lighter 32 ECT sheet.
Parcel shipping, LTL freight, and full truckload each punish packaging in different ways. Parcel networks can be rough on corners, labels, and closures because the box is going through conveyors, sortation, drops, and repeated handoffs. LTL freight introduces pallet compression, side-impact risk, and mixed-load stacking, while full truckload often adds long-duration vibration and deep stack pressure. If you’re building tips for reducing shipping damage into your process, you have to think channel by channel, not just product by product, because a carton that survives a 2-day parcel trip to Atlanta may still fail on a 900-mile LTL lane into Phoenix.
“The box looked beautiful on the sample table, but that wasn’t the environment it had to survive,” a Midwest fulfillment manager told me after we reviewed 87 damaged returns in one afternoon. “The trailer was the real test, and we hadn’t designed for that.” That sentence sticks with me because it captures the truth behind many tips for reducing shipping damage: design for reality, not for the showroom, and validate the packout with a transit profile that includes actual carrier handling instead of only bench-side approval.
Good packaging is not just a box. It is a system. Corrugated board, cushioning, inserts, closure method, labeling, pallet pattern, and handling instructions all have to work together. If one element is weak, the whole packout suffers. I’ve seen beautifully printed cartons fail because the tape choice was wrong, and I’ve seen plain kraft boxes outperform premium printed packaging because the structure was right. That’s why tips for reducing shipping damage should always treat the shipper as a system, not a single component, and why a 1.9 mil tape from Shurtape or a reinforced fiber tape can outperform a cheaper pressure-sensitive option in a humid dock in Savannah, Georgia.
The biggest shift happens when teams stop asking, “How do we make this look better?” and start asking, “How do we keep this from failing at the dock, in the truck, and at final mile?” That one mindset change can cut claims surprisingly fast. Honestly, I think that’s one of the most useful tips for reducing shipping damage anyone can adopt, especially if your current shipper uses a 12 x 9 x 6 stock carton when a 10 x 8 x 5 die-cut would remove nearly all internal motion.
How shipping protection works inside the package system
Protection starts with physics, not decoration. Corrugated flutes absorb part of an impact by compressing in a controlled way, void fill reduces movement, inserts suspend the item, and strong closures keep the package from opening when it’s flexed, dropped, or stacked. If you’ve ever opened a box and heard the product rattle, you already know the package failed at the most basic level. Among all tips for reducing shipping damage, eliminating that internal movement is one of the fastest wins, and in many cases a die-cut insert made from 18-point SBS or 350gsm C1S artboard can stop the issue more effectively than a pile of loose kraft paper.
Box strength is usually measured by burst strength, edge crush test or ECT, and box compression. Those numbers matter because a carton that looks fine on the bench can crush in a trailer when 8 or 10 layers are stacked on top of it. A 200# burst carton and a 32 ECT carton are not interchangeable in every application, and I’ve watched people learn that lesson the expensive way. If your shipment rides under other freight, the compression load matters just as much as the drop test, particularly in hot months when a trailer in Texas can reach 120 degrees Fahrenheit and weaken board performance faster than a cold warehouse in Minneapolis.
Product fragility changes everything. A ceramic mug, a machined aluminum part, a soft-touch cosmetic jar, and a flat-printed brochure all need different forms of package protection. Even the center of gravity matters. Tall, top-heavy items tip inside the carton more easily, while irregular shapes create pressure points where the board can crease or the product can rub through a finish. The best tips for reducing shipping damage always begin by identifying exactly where the item is vulnerable: edges, corners, lids, seams, screens, coatings, or threaded parts, and then matching the insert geometry to those weak points with a tolerance of roughly 1 to 2 millimeters rather than eyeballing the fit.
Climate is another factor people underestimate. Paper-based packaging performs differently in humid Florida than it does in a dry warehouse in Arizona. I’ve seen cartons absorb enough moisture in a cold-loading dock to soften a closure line, then fail when the trailer warmed up and condensation formed. If your product crosses regions or sits in storage before shipment, humidity resistance, adhesive selection, and board performance deserve attention. That’s one of the less glamorous but most effective tips for reducing shipping damage, particularly if your shipments move through Miami, New Orleans, or Houston between September and March.
Packages should be designed for the worst expected touchpoints, including conveyor drops, sortation chutes, forklift movement, manual handoffs, and final-mile delivery. In a facility outside Dallas, I watched a line of parcels go through a right-angle transfer where lighter cartons were catching the edge and twisting just enough to separate a weak seam. The design looked adequate on a table; under a conveyor, it was not. The best tips for reducing shipping damage account for every touchpoint, not just the first and last one, which is why a 3-foot drop test can tell you more than a polished mockup ever will.
If you want a technical framework for testing and performance, organizations like the International Safe Transit Association and the Institute of Packaging Professionals are useful references. I also recommend checking materials guidance from EPA resources when you’re balancing protection with sustainability claims, especially for paper recovery and source reduction. Good tips for reducing shipping damage can still align with responsible material choices, including FSC-certified corrugated board sourced from mills in Georgia, Pennsylvania, or Wisconsin.
Key factors that influence shipping damage and packaging cost
Weight, dimensions, fragility, and shipping method are the four variables I look at first. A 2-pound cosmetics kit and a 28-pound parts kit should not be treated the same, even if the outer footprint is similar. Oversized packaging can drive up dimensional weight charges, while underpackaging creates replacements, reships, labor waste, and customer frustration. The smartest tips for reducing shipping damage usually save money in more than one place at once, which is why a packaging audit often finds $1.50 in avoidable cost for every $0.20 unit-price increase the team was worried about.
There is always a tradeoff between packaging spend and damage spend. A stronger corrugated box, custom inserts, tamper-evident tape, and proper testing might add cents or dollars per unit, but those upgrades can cut claim rates fast enough to justify the change. For example, on a run of 5,000 units, moving from a stock single-wall carton to a custom die-cut with a more accurate fit might add $0.18 to $0.42 per unit depending on board grade and print coverage, yet the savings in returns and customer service labor can easily outweigh that. That’s one of the most practical tips for reducing shipping damage: compare the package cost to the cost of failure, not just to the price of the box, especially when the average replacement shipment costs $6.75 in freight and handling.
Here’s a simple packaging cost comparison I’ve used in client meetings. A stock carton may be cheap up front, but it often needs extra void fill and more labor to pack. A custom carton costs more to produce, but it can reduce insert count, speed order fulfillment, and improve fit. Molded pulp inserts may cost less than foam in some cases, but not always; foam can win on impact absorption for certain fragile electronics, while pulp is often better for nesting, branding, and fiber recovery. Good tips for reducing shipping damage need to be specific about the product, the shipping lane, and the total landed packaging cost, whether the inserts are thermoformed in Shenzhen, die-cut in Chicago, or molded in Mexico City.
Labor time is a hidden expense that gets ignored far too often. I visited a fulfillment center where the packout used six loose components, two tape applications, and a separate instruction sheet folded into every carton. The product was protected, but line speed suffered by 18% and mispacks increased on second shift. Sometimes the best tips for reducing shipping damage are also the simplest: fewer parts, clearer assembly, and less room for human variation, especially when a pack station is trying to turn 900 orders per shift with a labor target of 22 seconds per unit.
Supplier quality matters more than many purchasing teams realize. Board caliper variation, adhesive performance, print registration, and cut accuracy all influence consistency. If the corrugated sheet is inconsistent by even a small margin, a die-cut insert may not hold the product centered the same way every time. That is why I tell clients to audit shipping materials for consistency, not just appearance. Reliable tips for reducing shipping damage depend on reliable inputs, and that means asking whether the carton blanks are being converted in Dongguan, Monterrey, or Milwaukee with the same die tolerance and glue-line control every week.
In one supplier negotiation I sat in on, the buyer wanted to shave 6% from the carton price, but the converter warned that the lower-priced board had more caliper variation and weaker score lines. They tried it anyway. Damage claims rose within two months, and the savings disappeared. Cheap packaging is often expensive packaging in disguise, which is why tips for reducing shipping damage should be evaluated over the full cost cycle, not just the purchase order line, especially when a $0.11 savings turns into $3.40 in replacement cost.
Step-by-step process for reducing shipping damage
Start with a product assessment. Measure the actual outer dimensions, weigh the item fully packed, and identify the fragility points. Does it need corner protection, suspension, moisture resistance, or simple movement control? Shake the prototype gently. If the product shifts even a little, the package needs work. I’ve seen a $70 retail item fail because it had 9 millimeters of lateral travel inside the carton. That kind of slop defeats many tips for reducing shipping damage before the box even leaves the packing station, and a quick fit check against a 10 x 8 x 4 insert tray can usually catch it.
Next, Choose the Right outer carton based on weight and channel. A product shipping parcel through a carrier network may need a different board grade than the same product on a pallet for LTL freight. The carton should be sized so the item has minimal void space without creating squeeze pressure that could deform the product or the inner tray. Too large is bad. Too tight is also bad. The best tips for reducing shipping damage sit right in that middle zone where fit is snug but not crushing, and where a 44 ECT double-wall box might be the right choice for a 16-pound order going from Indianapolis to Seattle.
Select cushioning or inserts that stop migration. Kraft paper is excellent for dunnage in some applications, especially where the product can tolerate a softer hold. Foam can offer high-energy impact resistance for sensitive parts, while molded pulp is a solid option for sustainability-focused programs and repeatable nesting. Corrugated inserts work well for separating components, creating suspension, or building internal walls. Air pillows can help fill voids, but they are usually not a substitute for real restraint. Strong tips for reducing shipping damage always match the cushioning to the failure mode, and in many programs a custom insert made on 0.024-inch chipboard or 350gsm C1S artboard is enough to solve the problem without moving to foam.
Closure method is just as important. Pressure-sensitive tape, reinforced tape, hot-melt adhesive, staples, or a combination can all be correct depending on the load and the carton design. For heavy cartons, I like to see strong H-seal patterns and enough tape width to bridge the seam cleanly. In cold storage, tape performance can drop if the adhesive isn’t suited to low temperatures. One of the most overlooked tips for reducing shipping damage is simply making sure the box stays closed under real-world conditions, especially if it will move through a refrigerated facility in Chicago or a winter dock in Minneapolis where adhesives can behave very differently than they do at 72 degrees Fahrenheit.
Add clear handling labels, orientation arrows, and pallet stack instructions when needed. If a carton contains liquid, a fragile assembly, or a top-loaded product, say so plainly and consistently. Don’t hide a handling instruction under a branding element or tiny print. The dock team has about two seconds to read it. I’ve seen cartons marked “This Side Up” on the wrong panel, which created avoidable damage because the instruction wasn’t visible on the face the handler actually saw. Good tips for reducing shipping damage depend on clear communication, and large 4-inch black arrows printed on two adjacent panels are much more useful than a subtle icon buried in the artwork.
When the package goes onto a pallet, the rules get stricter. Use a stable pattern, keep overhang to a minimum, and wrap the load tightly enough to reduce shifting without crushing the cartons. Poor palletization is a surprisingly common source of problems in transit packaging. A good carton can still fail if the pallet load leans, slides, or gets pinched in a trailer. If you want practical tips for reducing shipping damage, don’t stop at the carton; look at the pallet pattern too, and consider using a 48 x 40 base with corner boards and 80-gauge stretch film for heavier mixed loads.
For customers who need branded shipping supplies, I often point them toward formats that are designed for the channel they actually use, whether that means Custom Shipping Boxes, Custom Poly Mailers, or a broader mix of Custom Packaging Products. The point is not to buy more packaging. It’s to buy the right shipping materials for the job, which is one of the clearest tips for reducing shipping damage I can give, especially when the right mailer is a 2.5 mil co-ex mailer from a converter in Ontario, California rather than a generic stock pouch.
Process and timeline considerations from design to shipment
The best packaging projects follow a disciplined sequence: product review, packaging concepting, prototype creation, drop and transit testing, revisions, then final production approval. That order matters. I’ve watched teams skip straight to production because a trade show deadline was looming, only to discover that the first 300 units were failing at the corners. A short prototyping cycle is far cheaper than a full recall of damaged product, and that is one of the most practical tips for reducing shipping damage, especially when the prototype cost is $125 and the claim exposure on the launch run is $9,000.
Lead time depends on material availability, tooling, print complexity, and whether the project requires a new dieline or insert mold. A straightforward stock-carton change might move faster than a custom die-cut with a new insert set and multi-color print, while a custom poly mailer can have very different timing than a rigid paperboard setup. In my experience, teams that leave room for a 12- to 15-business-day prototype window from proof approval have a much easier time catching weak spots before launch. These timeline details matter because tips for reducing shipping damage are only useful if they’re implemented before volume starts moving, and a proof approved on Monday in Los Angeles may still need 2 to 3 business days for tooling and another week for samples.
Testing should happen before the first large shipment, not after. That sounds obvious, but plenty of businesses still treat damage reports as the test plan. Real-world failures usually cost more than the prototype cycle because once product is in the field, you pay for the item, the freight, the return, the labor, and the customer relationship. ISTA-style transit testing, drop tests, and compression tests give you data before the claims arrive. If I had to rank tips for reducing shipping damage by financial impact, early testing would be near the top, especially when a 10-unit sample run can reveal a seam weakness that would have cost $2,400 over a 1,000-unit launch.
Production scheduling affects quality too. If a fulfillment line is rushed or a last-minute substitution gets approved because inventory is low, weaker materials can slip in unnoticed. I saw one operation swap a specified board grade for a lighter equivalent during peak season, and the damage rate rose within days. They were trying to keep order fulfillment moving, but the shortcut cost them in refunds. Strong tips for reducing shipping damage always include material control, not just design control, and that means locking the BOM, the insert spec, and the tape SKU before the first pallet leaves the plant.
Seasonal shipping spikes deserve their own mention. Peak periods can stretch carrier networks, reduce handling consistency, and leave more parcels exposed to rougher sorting conditions. That is the time to build in a little extra protection, tighten QC, and avoid last-minute changes. In many cases, the same carton that performs fine in a calm shipping period will fail when carriers are overloaded and packs are stacked taller, tighter, and longer. Planning ahead is one of the simplest tips for reducing shipping damage, but it’s still one of the most ignored, particularly in Q4 when carriers in Memphis, Louisville, and Dallas move millions of packages per day.
Common mistakes that make shipping damage worse
Oversized boxes with too much void space are one of the most common failures I see. People think extra room is safer because they can stuff more filler inside, but too much movement turns the product into a projectile. On the floor, we call it “boxing the rattle.” Once a product has room to build momentum, impact damage becomes much more likely. That is why some of the best tips for reducing shipping damage are really about reducing internal travel distance, often by cutting the internal clearance from 20 millimeters down to 4 or 5.
Thin cartons used for heavy items are another obvious but persistent problem. A lightweight retail carton might be fine for apparel or small accessories, but it can fail fast on tools, glassware, or dense metal components. The box may survive one shipment, then buckle on the second. People often assume a carton is a carton, but board grade and construction type are part of the engineering. If you want reliable tips for reducing shipping damage, stop treating all corrugated as equal, especially when a 200# C-flute box and a 44 ECT double-wall RSC are clearly built for different loads.
Weak tape and poor seals fail more often than many teams expect, especially on cartons that are heavy, cold, or stored under pressure. I’ve seen tape lift at the seam because the adhesive was chosen for cost instead of performance, and once a seal starts to peel, the box can open just enough for the product to shift. Cheap tape looks fine until the shipment is in motion. Good tips for reducing shipping damage should always include closure testing under cold, hot, and humid conditions if your product sees those environments, whether that’s a January dock in Chicago or a summer trailer in Orlando.
Poor labeling and no orientation markers create handling errors even when the packaging structure is decent. A strong carton can still be mishandled if the operator cannot tell which side should face up, where the fragile edge sits, or how the pallet should be stacked. I’ve watched dock crews move fast enough that they rely on clear marks more than you’d think. If the marks are vague, smudged, or placed on the wrong panel, the package loses another layer of protection. That’s why clear instruction is one of the simplest tips for reducing shipping damage available, and why a visible 1-inch orientation label beats a tiny 6-point icon every time.
Skipping sample testing is probably the biggest mistake of all. Bench confidence is not transit confidence. A packout can look great in a conference room and still fail in a drop test, a vibration cycle, or a compression scenario. I’ve had clients insist their product was “not fragile,” then watch the first production sample arrive with broken corners and scuffed surfaces. There is no substitute for testing, and among all tips for reducing shipping damage, this is the one that saves the most expensive mistakes, whether the failure appears after a 36-inch corner drop or a 72-hour vibration profile.
Expert tips to reduce damage without overspending
Design packaging around actual distribution data rather than assumptions. That means looking at ship tests, drop tests, compression tests, and the feedback from returns and claims. If 80% of your damage comes from corner crush, don’t spend all your budget on prettier print. Fix the corner structure first. Real data turns vague tips for reducing shipping damage into practical action, and sometimes that means reinforcing only one panel with a 0.030-inch chipboard corner protector instead of upgrading the entire carton.
Use the lightest packaging that still passes real-world tests. Overbuilding can raise dimensional weight costs, increase material usage, and slow packing lines, all without improving performance beyond a certain point. I’m a big believer in not overpackaging just to feel safe. Better engineering often beats heavier board. The smartest tips for reducing shipping damage often come from right-sizing, not over-specifying, and a carton that drops from 12 ounces to 9.4 ounces can still perform if the insert geometry is accurate.
Standardize carton sizes and insert families across multiple SKUs where possible. A modular approach reduces complexity, speeds fulfillment, and improves consistency on the line. Instead of designing 12 unique packouts, see whether three carton sizes and two insert styles can cover most of the range. I’ve seen operations shave significant labor time simply by reducing the number of packout variations. That kind of standardization is one of the most underrated tips for reducing shipping damage because it reduces human error as much as physical risk, especially when a packer can go from SKU to SKU without retraining on every box code.
Moisture barriers, desiccants, and laminated wraps can be smart additions for sensitive products, especially when the route includes humid regions or warehouse dwell time. Not every product needs them, and they are not a cure-all, but they can make a difference for paper goods, coated finishes, electronics, and metal components. The key is to use them where they solve a documented problem. Thoughtful tips for reducing shipping damage always distinguish between real need and unnecessary spend, and a $0.08 desiccant pack can be justified if it prevents a $4.50 rust-related return on a metal component.
Work with a packaging partner who understands corrugated structures, converting lines, and fulfillment workflows. A vendor who only sells boxes may miss the assembly constraints inside your warehouse, while a partner who has spent time on the floor will understand what happens at 6:00 a.m. when the team is trying to pack 1,200 orders before carrier pickup. In my experience, the best tips for reducing shipping damage come from people who understand both the engineering and the labor behind the package, whether the converting plant is in Grand Rapids, offset printing is in Nashville, or assembly happens in a 40,000-square-foot facility in Charlotte.
And if sustainability is part of the brief, don’t treat that as separate from protection. FSC-certified fiber sources, right-sized cartons, and fewer mixed materials can support both recovery and performance goals. I’m careful here because sustainability claims depend on the full material stream, but it is absolutely possible to improve package protection while reducing waste. That balance is one of the more mature tips for reducing shipping damage because it respects both the product and the supply chain, and because a carton made from recycled fiber in a mill outside Richmond, Virginia can still be engineered to a 44 ECT standard.
One more practical thought: keep a photo log of damaged returns with notes on the failure pattern. Over time, you’ll see whether the problem is compression, puncture, moisture, or movement. I’ve watched a client cut claims simply by noticing that every failure photo showed one crushed lower corner, which led to a small change in insert geometry and board spec. Data like that turns abstract tips for reducing shipping damage into precise fixes, especially when the same failure repeats across 100 units out of a 2,500-unit monthly shipment.
My honest opinion: the cheapest package is rarely the cheapest package. If a carton saves $0.06 and generates even a small increase in returns, it is probably costing you more than it saves. I’ve seen that play out in factories, in client audits, and in supplier meetings where everyone was focused on unit price instead of total cost. Good tips for reducing shipping damage help you think like an operator, not just a buyer, and that often means paying $0.15 per unit for 5,000 pieces if the alternative is a 3% damage rate and a flood of replacements.
FAQs
What are the best tips for reducing shipping damage on fragile items?
Use a strong outer carton matched to the item weight, not just the item size. Prevent movement with molded pulp, foam, or corrugated inserts instead of loose fill alone. Test the packout with drop and vibration simulations before shipping at scale. These are the core tips for reducing shipping damage I recommend first for glass, ceramics, electronics, and coated display items, especially when the item weighs more than 2 pounds or includes a fragile finish.
How do I know if my packaging is causing shipping damage?
Look for consistent damage patterns such as crushed corners, broken edges, or scuffed surfaces. Check whether the product shifts inside the box when shaken or if the carton shows poor compression performance. Review return photos and carrier claims to see whether failures happen at the same point in transit. If the same failure shows up repeatedly, your packaging system is probably part of the problem, and your tips for reducing shipping damage should focus on that weak point first, whether it is tape failure, void space, or weak board.
Do custom boxes really help reduce shipping damage?
Yes, custom boxes can reduce void space and improve fit, which lowers movement and impact inside the shipper. They can also improve stacking strength and reduce the need for excess void fill. For many products, the packaging savings in damage reduction outweigh the added box cost. That’s one of the clearest tips for reducing shipping damage for brands shipping at volume, especially when a custom insert and a tighter dieline remove 10 to 15 millimeters of travel from the packout.
How much should I spend on packaging to lower damage rates?
Spend based on the cost of failure, including replacements, reships, labor, and customer churn. Start with the smallest upgrade that solves the problem, such as better tape, stronger board, or a simple insert. Use testing data to justify where a modest packaging increase will save more money overall. In practice, the right tips for reducing shipping damage usually lead to targeted spending, not blanket upgrades, and a $0.22 insert can be the difference between profit and a wave of claims.
What should I do first if my shipments are arriving damaged?
Inspect damaged returns and identify whether the failure is from impact, compression, moisture, or movement. Review the current box size, cushioning, and sealing method, then compare it to the shipping channel. Run a prototype test with improved packaging before changing the full production line. That sequence gives you the fastest route to effective tips for reducing shipping damage without guessing, and it can usually be started within 3 to 5 business days if you already have samples and return photos in hand.
If you’re trying to tighten up shipping performance, remember this: the right tips for reducing shipping damage are usually not dramatic, but they are measurable. A stronger carton, a better insert, a more reliable seal, cleaner labeling, and a little more testing can save far more than they cost. I’ve watched that happen in plants, in warehouses, and in customer service reports, and it never stops being satisfying when the claims finally start dropping, especially after a move from a 32 ECT stock box to a custom 44 ECT design with a better internal fit.
For brands that want packaging built around real transit conditions, not just shelf appeal, that’s where Custom Logo Things can help through the right mix of Custom Packaging Products, Custom Shipping Boxes, and Custom Poly Mailers. If your next step is reducing returns and protecting your margins, these tips for reducing shipping damage are a strong place to start, and the right prototype can often be ready in 12-15 business days from proof approval.
